Phoenix Newsletter - October 2025 President’s Message: Enduring Commitments in a Time of Change Read President’s Message: Enduring Commitments in a Time of Change
Home Research Research Library ABFM’s Physicians Quality Reporting System registry ABFM’s Physicians Quality Reporting System registry 2011 Author(s) Hagen, Michael D Topic(s) Family Medicine Certification Keyword(s) Medicare Volume Annals of Family Medicine Source Annals of Family Medicine In 2006, Congress passed the Tax Relief and Health Care Act, which included provisions requiring the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) to establish a quality reporting system, the Physicians Quality Reporting Initiative (now called the Physicians Quality Reporting System) for eligible health care providers, which would include financial incentives for participants.1 This system initially used a fairly cumbersome set of “G-Codes” for reporting quality indicators as part of the claims process. Subsequently, the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007 and the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 provided an alternative registry method for reporting quality indicators in the incentive program.1 Under the registry method, quality organizations could apply to become approved registries and submit data on behalf of their clients. The application process included interviews by CMS staff, as well as a description of the organization’s proposed registry architecture and structure. The first registries approved became active in the second half of 2008. The American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) was the only medical specialty board approved in the initial group of registries. ABFM Research Read all 2021 Factors Associated with Time Spent Practicing Sports Medicine by Those with a Certificate of Added Qualification Go to Factors Associated with Time Spent Practicing Sports Medicine by Those with a Certificate of Added Qualification 2025 Knowledge Self-Assessment Engagement and Family Medicine Board Examination Outcomes Go to Knowledge Self-Assessment Engagement and Family Medicine Board Examination Outcomes 2015 ABFM’s self-assessment module (SAM) revision process Go to ABFM’s self-assessment module (SAM) revision process 2013 Criterion-referenced examinations: implications for the reporting and interpretation of examination results Go to Criterion-referenced examinations: implications for the reporting and interpretation of examination results
Author(s) Hagen, Michael D Topic(s) Family Medicine Certification Keyword(s) Medicare Volume Annals of Family Medicine Source Annals of Family Medicine
ABFM Research Read all 2021 Factors Associated with Time Spent Practicing Sports Medicine by Those with a Certificate of Added Qualification Go to Factors Associated with Time Spent Practicing Sports Medicine by Those with a Certificate of Added Qualification 2025 Knowledge Self-Assessment Engagement and Family Medicine Board Examination Outcomes Go to Knowledge Self-Assessment Engagement and Family Medicine Board Examination Outcomes 2015 ABFM’s self-assessment module (SAM) revision process Go to ABFM’s self-assessment module (SAM) revision process 2013 Criterion-referenced examinations: implications for the reporting and interpretation of examination results Go to Criterion-referenced examinations: implications for the reporting and interpretation of examination results
2021 Factors Associated with Time Spent Practicing Sports Medicine by Those with a Certificate of Added Qualification Go to Factors Associated with Time Spent Practicing Sports Medicine by Those with a Certificate of Added Qualification
2025 Knowledge Self-Assessment Engagement and Family Medicine Board Examination Outcomes Go to Knowledge Self-Assessment Engagement and Family Medicine Board Examination Outcomes
2015 ABFM’s self-assessment module (SAM) revision process Go to ABFM’s self-assessment module (SAM) revision process
2013 Criterion-referenced examinations: implications for the reporting and interpretation of examination results Go to Criterion-referenced examinations: implications for the reporting and interpretation of examination results