research Performance Evaluation of the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT-4) on the Family Medicine In-Training Examination Read Performance Evaluation of the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT-4) on the Family Medicine In-Training Examination
Beyond the Clinic Family Medicine on a Mission Part 1: How Air Force Physicians Achieve Humanitarian Goals Read Family Medicine on a Mission Part 1: How Air Force Physicians Achieve Humanitarian Goals
Phoenix Newsletter - March 2025 President’s Message: ABFM’s Unwavering Commitment to Diplomates and the Specialty Read President’s Message: ABFM’s Unwavering Commitment to Diplomates and the Specialty
Home Research Research Library Dimensionality of the Maintenance of Certification for Family Physicians Examination: Evidence of Construct Validity Dimensionality of the Maintenance of Certification for Family Physicians Examination: Evidence of Construct Validity 2013 Author(s) Royal, Kenneth D, and Puffer, James C Topic(s) Family Medicine Certification Keyword(s) Cognitive Expertise Volume Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Source Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine The American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) Maintenance of Certification for Family Physicians (MC-FP) examination is designed to measure a single construct: clinical decision-making abilities within the scope of practice of family medicine. Implied in the construct of clinical decision-making abilities is the ability to recall relevant elements from a large fund of pertinent medical knowledge. While clinical decision-making abilities could be perceived as comprising several separate constructs (eg, based upon clinical categories, organ systems, etc), that approach would require the development of multiple assessment scales with a passing criteria specific to each. Instead, the overarching construct of clinical decision-making ability, which encompasses those more specific areas, has been selected by the ABFM because it more closely mirrors the pass-fail decision process used to discern which candidates receive certification. In any instance, the construct that the ABFM attempts to measure needs to be sufficiently unidimensional in order to produce precise, error-free estimates of a candidate’s performance. This brief article will discuss the dimensionality of the MC-FP examination and its implications for construct validity, namely the validation that the examination accurately measures the ability of family physicians to make appropriate clinical decisions. Read More ABFM Research Read all 2010 Family medicine at 40 years of age: the journey to transformation continues Go to Family medicine at 40 years of age: the journey to transformation continues 2016 Reducing Burden, Assuring Competence, Improving Quality, and Enhancing Professionalism: How Can Abfm Contribute to All? Go to Reducing Burden, Assuring Competence, Improving Quality, and Enhancing Professionalism: How Can Abfm Contribute to All? 2019 Physician Opinions about American Board of Family Medicine Self-Assessment Modules (2006–2016) Go to Physician Opinions about American Board of Family Medicine Self-Assessment Modules (2006–2016) 2017 What Family Physicians Really Think of Maintenance of Certification Part II Activities Go to What Family Physicians Really Think of Maintenance of Certification Part II Activities
Author(s) Royal, Kenneth D, and Puffer, James C Topic(s) Family Medicine Certification Keyword(s) Cognitive Expertise Volume Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Source Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
ABFM Research Read all 2010 Family medicine at 40 years of age: the journey to transformation continues Go to Family medicine at 40 years of age: the journey to transformation continues 2016 Reducing Burden, Assuring Competence, Improving Quality, and Enhancing Professionalism: How Can Abfm Contribute to All? Go to Reducing Burden, Assuring Competence, Improving Quality, and Enhancing Professionalism: How Can Abfm Contribute to All? 2019 Physician Opinions about American Board of Family Medicine Self-Assessment Modules (2006–2016) Go to Physician Opinions about American Board of Family Medicine Self-Assessment Modules (2006–2016) 2017 What Family Physicians Really Think of Maintenance of Certification Part II Activities Go to What Family Physicians Really Think of Maintenance of Certification Part II Activities
2010 Family medicine at 40 years of age: the journey to transformation continues Go to Family medicine at 40 years of age: the journey to transformation continues
2016 Reducing Burden, Assuring Competence, Improving Quality, and Enhancing Professionalism: How Can Abfm Contribute to All? Go to Reducing Burden, Assuring Competence, Improving Quality, and Enhancing Professionalism: How Can Abfm Contribute to All?
2019 Physician Opinions about American Board of Family Medicine Self-Assessment Modules (2006–2016) Go to Physician Opinions about American Board of Family Medicine Self-Assessment Modules (2006–2016)
2017 What Family Physicians Really Think of Maintenance of Certification Part II Activities Go to What Family Physicians Really Think of Maintenance of Certification Part II Activities