Beyond the Clinic Family Medicine on a Mission Part 1: How Air Force Physicians Achieve Humanitarian Goals Read Family Medicine on a Mission Part 1: How Air Force Physicians Achieve Humanitarian Goals
Phoenix Newsletter - March 2025 President’s Message: ABFM’s Unwavering Commitment to Diplomates and the Specialty Read President’s Message: ABFM’s Unwavering Commitment to Diplomates and the Specialty
Home Research Research Library Understanding the “sum of subtest to overall score discrepancy” on the MC-FP examination Understanding the “sum of subtest to overall score discrepancy” on the MC-FP examination 2012 Author(s) Royal, Kenneth D, and Puffer, James C Topic(s) Family Medicine Certification Keyword(s) Cognitive Expertise, and Psychometrics Volume Annals of Family Medicine Source Annals of Family Medicine When high-stakes examinations, such as the American Board of Family Medicine’s (ABFM) Maintenance of Certifi cation-in Family Practice (MC-FP) examination are administered, candidates and diplomates are keenly interested in the accuracy of their test scores, especially when their scores are close to, but below, the pass/fail cut point. In some instances, candidates will attempt to reverse engineer their scores using the information provided on the score report in an effort to verify the “weighted sum of the subtest scores” is congruent with the overall test score. Any discrepancy might become alarming to the candidate, providing a seemingly legitimate reason to believe the overall score was inaccurate, thus prompting a phone call to the ABFM for further investigation and clarifi cation. Historically, such a mistake in scoring has never been found; however, a statistical phenomenon that we will describe below could make it appear so. We would like to explain this phenomenon so that examinees who attempt to reverse engineer their score reports will better understand the “sum of subtest to overall score discrepancy” phenomenon. Read More ABFM Research Read all 2021 Towards a Quality Agenda for Family Medicine Go to Towards a Quality Agenda for Family Medicine 2013 Maintenance of certification and its association with the clinical knowledge of family physicians Go to Maintenance of certification and its association with the clinical knowledge of family physicians 2022 Measuring Graduate Medical Education Outcomes to Honor the Social Contract Go to Measuring Graduate Medical Education Outcomes to Honor the Social Contract 2022 Advances in the Cognitive Science and Their Implications for ABFM Knowledge Assessment Go to Advances in the Cognitive Science and Their Implications for ABFM Knowledge Assessment
Author(s) Royal, Kenneth D, and Puffer, James C Topic(s) Family Medicine Certification Keyword(s) Cognitive Expertise, and Psychometrics Volume Annals of Family Medicine Source Annals of Family Medicine
ABFM Research Read all 2021 Towards a Quality Agenda for Family Medicine Go to Towards a Quality Agenda for Family Medicine 2013 Maintenance of certification and its association with the clinical knowledge of family physicians Go to Maintenance of certification and its association with the clinical knowledge of family physicians 2022 Measuring Graduate Medical Education Outcomes to Honor the Social Contract Go to Measuring Graduate Medical Education Outcomes to Honor the Social Contract 2022 Advances in the Cognitive Science and Their Implications for ABFM Knowledge Assessment Go to Advances in the Cognitive Science and Their Implications for ABFM Knowledge Assessment
2013 Maintenance of certification and its association with the clinical knowledge of family physicians Go to Maintenance of certification and its association with the clinical knowledge of family physicians
2022 Measuring Graduate Medical Education Outcomes to Honor the Social Contract Go to Measuring Graduate Medical Education Outcomes to Honor the Social Contract
2022 Advances in the Cognitive Science and Their Implications for ABFM Knowledge Assessment Go to Advances in the Cognitive Science and Their Implications for ABFM Knowledge Assessment