Home Research Research Library The reliability of American Board of Family Medicine examinations: implications for test takers The reliability of American Board of Family Medicine examinations: implications for test takers 2012 Author(s) Royal, Kenneth D, and Puffer, James C Keyword(s) Psychometrics Volume 25(1):131-133 Source Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine A common theme among family physicians who have performed poorly repeatedly on the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) Maintenance of Certification (MC-FP) examination is the complaint that they received a score that was identical, or almost identical, to their score on a previous administration of the examination. From their perspective, why they received the exact same score (or a very similar score), despite additional study time and preparation, is a mystery. Often, physicians assume a mix-up has occurred and ask if it is possible that results have been provided erroneously from their previous attempt. After a psychometric review, it is clear that there is no mistake at all. In fact, we anticipate many test takers will receive a comparable score on future successful attempts at taking the examination. We base this anticipation on the psychometric concept of reliability. ABFM Research Read all 2026 Validity of Area-Based Social Risk Indices Used at Higher-Level Geographies and Clinic Locations Go to Validity of Area-Based Social Risk Indices Used at Higher-Level Geographies and Clinic Locations 2026 Family Physicians’ experiences of administrative Harms Go to Family Physicians’ experiences of administrative Harms 2026 Reclassifying Primary Care: A Decision Tree Approach to Improving Workforce Estimates and Research Using Claims Data Go to Reclassifying Primary Care: A Decision Tree Approach to Improving Workforce Estimates and Research Using Claims Data 2026 Strong Obstetric Care Training in Family Medicine Residency: Bolstering the Number of Family Physicians Attending Births Go to Strong Obstetric Care Training in Family Medicine Residency: Bolstering the Number of Family Physicians Attending Births
Author(s) Royal, Kenneth D, and Puffer, James C Keyword(s) Psychometrics Volume 25(1):131-133 Source Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
ABFM Research Read all 2026 Validity of Area-Based Social Risk Indices Used at Higher-Level Geographies and Clinic Locations Go to Validity of Area-Based Social Risk Indices Used at Higher-Level Geographies and Clinic Locations 2026 Family Physicians’ experiences of administrative Harms Go to Family Physicians’ experiences of administrative Harms 2026 Reclassifying Primary Care: A Decision Tree Approach to Improving Workforce Estimates and Research Using Claims Data Go to Reclassifying Primary Care: A Decision Tree Approach to Improving Workforce Estimates and Research Using Claims Data 2026 Strong Obstetric Care Training in Family Medicine Residency: Bolstering the Number of Family Physicians Attending Births Go to Strong Obstetric Care Training in Family Medicine Residency: Bolstering the Number of Family Physicians Attending Births
2026 Validity of Area-Based Social Risk Indices Used at Higher-Level Geographies and Clinic Locations Go to Validity of Area-Based Social Risk Indices Used at Higher-Level Geographies and Clinic Locations
2026 Family Physicians’ experiences of administrative Harms Go to Family Physicians’ experiences of administrative Harms
2026 Reclassifying Primary Care: A Decision Tree Approach to Improving Workforce Estimates and Research Using Claims Data Go to Reclassifying Primary Care: A Decision Tree Approach to Improving Workforce Estimates and Research Using Claims Data
2026 Strong Obstetric Care Training in Family Medicine Residency: Bolstering the Number of Family Physicians Attending Births Go to Strong Obstetric Care Training in Family Medicine Residency: Bolstering the Number of Family Physicians Attending Births