Diplomate Spotlight Opening Doors with Board Certification: A Conversation with Long Standing Diplomate Joseph Cook Read Opening Doors with Board Certification: A Conversation with Long Standing Diplomate Joseph Cook
Phoenix Newsletter - July 2025 Available Now: 2026 5-Year Cycle Registration Read Available Now: 2026 5-Year Cycle Registration
Home Research Research Library Family Medicine Clerkship Directors’ Handling of Student Mistreatment: Results From a CERA Survey Family Medicine Clerkship Directors’ Handling of Student Mistreatment: Results From a CERA Survey 2020 Author(s) Huang, William Y, Purkiss, Joel, Eden, Aimee R, and Appelbaum, Nital Topic(s) Education & Training Keyword(s) Undergraduate Medical Education Volume Family Medicine Source Family Medicine Background and Objectives: Little is known about how family medicine clerkship directors (FMCDs) handle reports of student mistreatment. We investigated FMCDs’ involvement in handling and resolving these reports. Methods: We collected data as part of the 2019 CERA survey of FMCDs. FMCDs provided responses on how they handled student mistreatment reports and their comfort level in resolving these reports. Results: Ninety-nine out of 142 FMCDs (69.7%) responded to the survey. Regarding mistreatment reports, 24.2% of FMCDs had received at least one report of student mistreatment about full-time faculty in the past 3 years, compared to 64.6% of FMCDs receiving at least one report about community preceptors (P<.001). Regarding who determined the response to the mistreatment, 13.1% of FMCDs were the highest level of leadership responsible for stopping use of a full-time faculty member for mistreatment concerns, while 42.4% of FMCDs were the highest level of leadership responsible for stopping use of a community preceptor. Regarding their comfort level in resolving mistreatment reports, 59.1% of FMCDs were either somewhat or very comfortable resolving a mistreatment report about a community preceptor, while only 48.9% reported those comfort levels for full-time faculty. FMCDs who had previously stopped using full-time faculty and/or community preceptors due to mistreatment reports were less likely to feel comfortable with resolving reports about full-time faculty compared to those who had no such experience (P=.03). Conclusions: FMCDs more frequently receive mistreatment reports about community preceptors than full-time faculty and are more likely to be the highest decision maker to stop using a community preceptor for mistreatment concerns. Further study is needed to elucidate factors that affect FMCDs’ comfort in handling student mistreatment reports. Read More ABFM Research Read all 2024 The Role of Residency Accreditation Program Requirements on Scholarly Activity in Family Medicine Go to The Role of Residency Accreditation Program Requirements on Scholarly Activity in Family Medicine 2022 The Promise of Aire Go to The Promise of Aire 2024 National Family Medicine Residency Outcomes Project Methodology Go to National Family Medicine Residency Outcomes Project Methodology 2015 The Predictive Validity of the ABFM’s In-Training Examination Go to The Predictive Validity of the ABFM’s In-Training Examination
Author(s) Huang, William Y, Purkiss, Joel, Eden, Aimee R, and Appelbaum, Nital Topic(s) Education & Training Keyword(s) Undergraduate Medical Education Volume Family Medicine Source Family Medicine
ABFM Research Read all 2024 The Role of Residency Accreditation Program Requirements on Scholarly Activity in Family Medicine Go to The Role of Residency Accreditation Program Requirements on Scholarly Activity in Family Medicine 2022 The Promise of Aire Go to The Promise of Aire 2024 National Family Medicine Residency Outcomes Project Methodology Go to National Family Medicine Residency Outcomes Project Methodology 2015 The Predictive Validity of the ABFM’s In-Training Examination Go to The Predictive Validity of the ABFM’s In-Training Examination
2024 The Role of Residency Accreditation Program Requirements on Scholarly Activity in Family Medicine Go to The Role of Residency Accreditation Program Requirements on Scholarly Activity in Family Medicine
2024 National Family Medicine Residency Outcomes Project Methodology Go to National Family Medicine Residency Outcomes Project Methodology
2015 The Predictive Validity of the ABFM’s In-Training Examination Go to The Predictive Validity of the ABFM’s In-Training Examination