Do family physicians electronic health records support meaningful use?

Author(s)

Peterson, Lars E, Blackburn, B E, Ivins, D J, Mitchell, J M, Matson, C, and Phillips, Robert L

Topic(s)

Achieving Health System Goals, and Role of Primary Care

Keyword(s)

Quality Of Care, and Health Information Technology (HIT)

Volume

3(1):38-42

Source

HealthCare

BACKGROUND:

Spurred by government incentives, the use of electronic health records (EHRs) in the United States has increased; however, whether these EHRs have the functionality necessary to meet meaningful use (MU) criteria remains unknown. Our objective was to characterize family physician access to MU functionality when using a MU-certified EHR.

METHODS:

Data were obtained from a convenience survey of family physicians accessing their American Board of Family Medicine online portfolio in 2011. A brief survey queried MU functionality. We used descriptive statistics to characterize the responses and bivariate statistics to test associations between MU and patient communication functions by presence of a MU-certified EHR. RESULTS: Out of 3855 respondents, 60% reported having an EHR that supports MU. Physicians with MU-certified EHRs were more likely than physicians without MU-certified EHRs to report patient registry activities (49.7% vs. 32.3%, p-value<0.01), tracking quality measures (74.1% vs. 56.4%, p-value<0.01), access to labs or consultation notes, and electronic prescribing; but electronic communication abilities were low regardless of EHR capabilities.

CONCLUSIONS:

Family physicians with MU-certified EHRs are more likely to report MU functionality; however, a sizeable minority does not report MU functions. IMPLICATIONS: Many family physicians with MU-certified EHRs may not successfully meet the successively stringent MU criteria and may face significant upgrade costs to do so. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cross sectional survey.
 

Read More

ABFM Research

Read all