Home Research Research Library The Decline in Family Medicine in-Training Examination Scores: What We Know and Why It Matters The Decline in Family Medicine in-Training Examination Scores: What We Know and Why It Matters 2023 Author(s) Newton, Warren P, Wang, Ting, and O’Neill, Thomas R Topic(s) Education & Training Keyword(s) In-Training Examination Volume 36(3):523-526 Source Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Since the first Board examination in Ophthalmology in 1916, assessment of cognitive expertise has been foundational to Board Certification. Since then, there have been dramatic improvements in the methodology of high-stakes examinations, including psychometric techniques, the writing of questions, and differential item functioning analysis. In 1969, ABFM introduced the requirement of periodic recertification to the Board Certification Community, and subsequent research in the cognitive sciences has confirmed the importance of independent assessment of cognitive expertise across many fields. To support family medicine residencies, the ABFM conducts an in-training examination (ITE) every fall; as of 2008, the ITE uses the same psychometric scale as the certification examination, making the scores comparable to certification scores. With the aid of an easy to use, web-based app (https://rtm.theabfm.org/bayesian/predictor), residents and their residency directors can estimate their likelihood of passing the Board certification examination. In both of the past 2 years, this app has been accessed more than 200,000 times by more than 15,000 users. ABFM Research Read all 2017 Family Physicians Practicing High-Volume Obstetric Care Have Recently Dropped by One-Half Go to Family Physicians Practicing High-Volume Obstetric Care Have Recently Dropped by One-Half 2013 A small percentage of family physicians report time devoted to research Go to A small percentage of family physicians report time devoted to research 2008 Value of information in virtual patients portraying pharyngitis Go to Value of information in virtual patients portraying pharyngitis 1999 Patients don’t present with five choices: an alternative to multiple-choice tests in assessing physicians’ competence Go to Patients don’t present with five choices: an alternative to multiple-choice tests in assessing physicians’ competence
Author(s) Newton, Warren P, Wang, Ting, and O’Neill, Thomas R Topic(s) Education & Training Keyword(s) In-Training Examination Volume 36(3):523-526 Source Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
ABFM Research Read all 2017 Family Physicians Practicing High-Volume Obstetric Care Have Recently Dropped by One-Half Go to Family Physicians Practicing High-Volume Obstetric Care Have Recently Dropped by One-Half 2013 A small percentage of family physicians report time devoted to research Go to A small percentage of family physicians report time devoted to research 2008 Value of information in virtual patients portraying pharyngitis Go to Value of information in virtual patients portraying pharyngitis 1999 Patients don’t present with five choices: an alternative to multiple-choice tests in assessing physicians’ competence Go to Patients don’t present with five choices: an alternative to multiple-choice tests in assessing physicians’ competence
2017 Family Physicians Practicing High-Volume Obstetric Care Have Recently Dropped by One-Half Go to Family Physicians Practicing High-Volume Obstetric Care Have Recently Dropped by One-Half
2013 A small percentage of family physicians report time devoted to research Go to A small percentage of family physicians report time devoted to research
2008 Value of information in virtual patients portraying pharyngitis Go to Value of information in virtual patients portraying pharyngitis
1999 Patients don’t present with five choices: an alternative to multiple-choice tests in assessing physicians’ competence Go to Patients don’t present with five choices: an alternative to multiple-choice tests in assessing physicians’ competence