Home Research Research Library Impact of One Versus Two Content-Specific Modules on American Board of Family Medicine Certification Examination Scores Impact of One Versus Two Content-Specific Modules on American Board of Family Medicine Certification Examination Scores 2017 Author(s) O’Neill, Thomas R, and Peabody, Michael R Topic(s) Family Medicine Certification Keyword(s) Psychometrics Volume Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Source Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine BACKGROUND: We consider the question of whether requiring diplomates to select only 1 content-specific module, rather than 2, would increase, decrease, or produce no change in scores among the examinee population. METHODS: Examinees’ scores were computed under 3 different conditions: the examination core plus (1) both modules, (2) the module on which they scored higher, and (3) the module on which they scored lower. RESULTS: Although the differences in scores across the 3 conditions were relatively small, asking examinees to select only a single module would likely benefit more examinees than it would harm by a 4:1 ratio, assuming that the diplomates selected the module on which they scored higher. Only 114 of the 29,088 examinees (0.4%) would have changed from a pass to a fail, whereas 467 (1.6%) would have changed from fail to pass. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that having examinees select 1 module rather than 2 will likely produce a slight score increase for examinees. Simultaneously, it would improve the standardization of the examination across examinees. ABFM Research Read all 2025 Milestones Progression of International Medical Graduates in Family Medicine Go to Milestones Progression of International Medical Graduates in Family Medicine 2007 Modeling relief Go to Modeling relief 2019 “That Was Pretty Powerful”: a Qualitative Study of What Physicians Learn When Preparing for Their Maintenance-of-Certification Exams Go to “That Was Pretty Powerful”: a Qualitative Study of What Physicians Learn When Preparing for Their Maintenance-of-Certification Exams 2011 The reliability of ABFM examinations: implications for test-takers Go to The reliability of ABFM examinations: implications for test-takers
Author(s) O’Neill, Thomas R, and Peabody, Michael R Topic(s) Family Medicine Certification Keyword(s) Psychometrics Volume Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Source Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
ABFM Research Read all 2025 Milestones Progression of International Medical Graduates in Family Medicine Go to Milestones Progression of International Medical Graduates in Family Medicine 2007 Modeling relief Go to Modeling relief 2019 “That Was Pretty Powerful”: a Qualitative Study of What Physicians Learn When Preparing for Their Maintenance-of-Certification Exams Go to “That Was Pretty Powerful”: a Qualitative Study of What Physicians Learn When Preparing for Their Maintenance-of-Certification Exams 2011 The reliability of ABFM examinations: implications for test-takers Go to The reliability of ABFM examinations: implications for test-takers
2025 Milestones Progression of International Medical Graduates in Family Medicine Go to Milestones Progression of International Medical Graduates in Family Medicine
2019 “That Was Pretty Powerful”: a Qualitative Study of What Physicians Learn When Preparing for Their Maintenance-of-Certification Exams Go to “That Was Pretty Powerful”: a Qualitative Study of What Physicians Learn When Preparing for Their Maintenance-of-Certification Exams
2011 The reliability of ABFM examinations: implications for test-takers Go to The reliability of ABFM examinations: implications for test-takers