Home Research Research Library Healthcare Workforce Implications of Physician Student Loan Repayment Funding Healthcare Workforce Implications of Physician Student Loan Repayment Funding 2023 Author(s) Davis, Caitlin S, Peterson, Lars E, and Bazemore, Andrew W Topic(s) Education & Training, and What Family Physicians Do Keyword(s) Rural Volume 21(Supplement 1):4221 Source Annals of Family Medicine Context: As the average level of medical education indebtedness rises, physicians look to loan repayment programs like Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF). This increase in PSLF uptake translates to growing taxpayer investment, while service-based programs like National Health Service Corps (NHSC) continue to assist a relatively small proportion of physicians with more stringent service commitments.Objective: The authors set out to study differences in the demographics, the scope of practice, and likelihood of practicing with a medically underserved population or a rural area in early career physicians who choose different loan repayment options.Study Design: Bivariate analysis of differences in demographics, practice location and scope between physicians who participate in Public Service Loan Forgiveness repayment and those who are National Health Service Corps membersSetting or Dataset: Data from over 10,000 American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) National Graduate Survey (NGS) respondentsPopulation Studied: Early career Family PhysiciansIntervention/Instrument: Self-reported loan repayment assistance modality, including Public Service Loan Forgiveness, National Health Service Corp, Military repayment, Indian Health Services repayment, and other state-based and private loan forgiveness schemesOutcome Measures: Demographic indicators including gender, race, ethnicity, degree type and international graduate status, and practice-based measures of location, scope and population servedResults: The authors found that the rate of PSLF uptake tripled between 2016 and 2020 while NHSC uptake remained static. Those physicians reporting NHSC assistance demonstrated broader scope of practice, were more likely to practice in areas that were rural (23.29% to 10.84% PSLF) or full Health Professions Shortage Areas (12.5% to 3.70% PSLF) and were more likely to work with medically underserved populations (82.17% to 24.22% PSLF).Expected Outcomes: While PSLF is intended to assist graduates engaged in public service, analysis suggests it is less effective than NHSC in directing physicians to underserved settings. These findings may prompt a reconsideration of funding goals and outcomes monitoring of service-based loan repayment assistance. ABFM Research Read all 2016 US family physicians’ intrauterine and implantable contraception provision: results from a national survey Go to US family physicians’ intrauterine and implantable contraception provision: results from a national survey 2020 General Practitioners in US Medical Practice Compared With Family Physicians Go to General Practitioners in US Medical Practice Compared With Family Physicians 1990 Residency training for rural primary care Go to Residency training for rural primary care 2025 Clerkship Rotations Are a Key Driver of Family Medicine Choice: Insights from the 2024 National Resident Survey Go to Clerkship Rotations Are a Key Driver of Family Medicine Choice: Insights from the 2024 National Resident Survey
Author(s) Davis, Caitlin S, Peterson, Lars E, and Bazemore, Andrew W Topic(s) Education & Training, and What Family Physicians Do Keyword(s) Rural Volume 21(Supplement 1):4221 Source Annals of Family Medicine
ABFM Research Read all 2016 US family physicians’ intrauterine and implantable contraception provision: results from a national survey Go to US family physicians’ intrauterine and implantable contraception provision: results from a national survey 2020 General Practitioners in US Medical Practice Compared With Family Physicians Go to General Practitioners in US Medical Practice Compared With Family Physicians 1990 Residency training for rural primary care Go to Residency training for rural primary care 2025 Clerkship Rotations Are a Key Driver of Family Medicine Choice: Insights from the 2024 National Resident Survey Go to Clerkship Rotations Are a Key Driver of Family Medicine Choice: Insights from the 2024 National Resident Survey
2016 US family physicians’ intrauterine and implantable contraception provision: results from a national survey Go to US family physicians’ intrauterine and implantable contraception provision: results from a national survey
2020 General Practitioners in US Medical Practice Compared With Family Physicians Go to General Practitioners in US Medical Practice Compared With Family Physicians
2025 Clerkship Rotations Are a Key Driver of Family Medicine Choice: Insights from the 2024 National Resident Survey Go to Clerkship Rotations Are a Key Driver of Family Medicine Choice: Insights from the 2024 National Resident Survey