research Performance Evaluation of the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT-4) on the Family Medicine In-Training Examination Read Performance Evaluation of the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT-4) on the Family Medicine In-Training Examination
post President’s Message: ABFM’s Unwavering Commitment to Diplomates and the Specialty Read President’s Message: ABFM’s Unwavering Commitment to Diplomates and the Specialty
post “Family Medicine Was All I Ever Wanted to Do” Dr. Phillip Wagner Read “Family Medicine Was All I Ever Wanted to Do”
Home Research Research Library A case for refereed journals The Evolution of Physician Certification and the Canary in the Coal Mine 2016 Topic(s) Family Medicine Certification In an address before the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology in 1908, Derrick T. Vail introduced the concept of using a peer-review system to evaluate the education, training, and qualifications of medical specialists and advocated for the development of a specialty board that would oversee this process. His foresight served as the springboard for the genesis of the specialty board movement in the United States and led to the establishment of the American Board for Ophthalmic Examinations, now the American Board of Ophthalmology,1 in 1916 Read More ABFM Research Read all 2017 What Family Physicians Really Think of Maintenance of Certification Part II Activities Go to What Family Physicians Really Think of Maintenance of Certification Part II Activities 2020 Characteristics of Family Medicine Residency Graduates, 1994-2017: An Update Go to Characteristics of Family Medicine Residency Graduates, 1994-2017: An Update 2012 Engagement of family physicians in maintenance of certification remains high Go to Engagement of family physicians in maintenance of certification remains high 1999 Patients don’t present with five choices: an alternative to multiple-choice tests in assessing physicians’ competence Go to Patients don’t present with five choices: an alternative to multiple-choice tests in assessing physicians’ competence
ABFM Research Read all 2017 What Family Physicians Really Think of Maintenance of Certification Part II Activities Go to What Family Physicians Really Think of Maintenance of Certification Part II Activities 2020 Characteristics of Family Medicine Residency Graduates, 1994-2017: An Update Go to Characteristics of Family Medicine Residency Graduates, 1994-2017: An Update 2012 Engagement of family physicians in maintenance of certification remains high Go to Engagement of family physicians in maintenance of certification remains high 1999 Patients don’t present with five choices: an alternative to multiple-choice tests in assessing physicians’ competence Go to Patients don’t present with five choices: an alternative to multiple-choice tests in assessing physicians’ competence
2017 What Family Physicians Really Think of Maintenance of Certification Part II Activities Go to What Family Physicians Really Think of Maintenance of Certification Part II Activities
2020 Characteristics of Family Medicine Residency Graduates, 1994-2017: An Update Go to Characteristics of Family Medicine Residency Graduates, 1994-2017: An Update
2012 Engagement of family physicians in maintenance of certification remains high Go to Engagement of family physicians in maintenance of certification remains high
1999 Patients don’t present with five choices: an alternative to multiple-choice tests in assessing physicians’ competence Go to Patients don’t present with five choices: an alternative to multiple-choice tests in assessing physicians’ competence
